Saturday, February 25, 2012

They won’t believe

by AHMET KURUCAN



Fethullah Gülen
20 April 2010 / AHMET KURUCAN *,
“They won’t believe,” he said. “They won’t believe that we work for peace and the salvation of humanity. They won’t believe that we endeavor to create an island of peace where all of humanity can live in brotherhood. They won’t believe that you do not have expectations for this world or the next. They won’t believe that you do not want anything other than securing God’s contentment.”
As he said this, his body was extremely tired and his voice so low that only a few people near him could hear, but his logic and reasoning was, as can be understood from the integrity of what he said, quite solid and whole, and his determination and commitment were, as usual, apparent with their customary calm, and his spirits and enthusiasm were as fervent as what would be expected from a young person.
He then turned and asked, with an air of self-questioning: “Why don’t they believe? Why do they, inside and outside, enter a process that can explained only with reference to the psychological disease called paranoia? Why can’t they get rid of their doubts and qualms? What has been said and done is evident, and despite there being nothing adding substance to their suspicions, why do they still look suspiciously at us?”
Answering, he said: “They do not look at the world from the same window as we do. They don’t believe in the hereafter as we do. The values that are dear to us mean nothing to them. We seek the hereafter, paradise, the divine beauty, and we say, ‘We do it to please God without any other motive,’ but they focus on this world, seeing everything other than that. We say we are not motivated by fame, glory, position or money, while they put them at the center of their lives. While we say, ‘One should not be deceived by this transient world, and we should do whatever we do in this ephemeral world with the hereafter in mind and to please God,’ they think and believe exactly the opposite. Knowing that ‘the tastes of this world are like a poisonous honey and pleasures are always accompanied by woes,’ we believe that all pleasures, legitimate or illegitimate, are means for being tested in this world, but they do not have such criteria in their hands.”
After uttering these words, he sighed deeply and said he was tired. He was really tired because for several days he had been suffering from a disease that should be treated at a hospital. He sighed because he was not or could not be understood. Obviously, what upsets, distresses and aggrieves people like him is not being understood. Especially when the people who cannot penetrate his world entertain the same values or are from the immediate vicinity of the same atmosphere, his sufferings can grow “towering high,” to borrow a phrase from Ziya Gökalp. In such cases, he would frequently quote the following lines: “If you are aggrieved, you should not complain about troubles / Do not expose your troubles to the unaggrieved people by sighing.”
Well, you may then ask why he is talking about them. I think this question betrays one’s perspective on life and even one’s quality or footing. Indeed, here we are talking not about an ordinary person, but one who is in love. We are referring to his inner world, his heart-oriented perspective, the lens through which he views the world and his horizon of objectives.
People who are in love with their troubles make remarks that seem to come out of nowhere. They are not bound by time or space. They adjust their style or wording according to the level of their addressees and express their troubles in any environment with carefully tuned dosages. They then direct people to what they think are the remedies for those troubles. A number of times I have heard him say: “If I had the capability or opportunity to do so, I would sow seeds of trouble, suffering and sorrow in the hearts of people and wait for their coming to leaf. The biggest trouble for today’s world is the lack of troubles.”
Perhaps, you noticed. I did not simply say “troubled” but “who loves his troubles.” This is because it would be an insult to characterize those who “love their troubles” as “troubled.” I have frequently heard him say: “O my Lord! Make me acquainted with the grief [trouble] of love. Do not separate me from the grief of love even for a moment!”
‘We should not develop despair’
At this point, he looked around, glancing appraisingly at every person in the room. Who knows what he had in mind? Apparently, he was worried that his words might be misunderstood as he resumed, saying: “But we should not be desperate. Yes, we should not develop despair. Lack of hope is characteristic of the unbelievers, according to the Quran. This does not mean that a Muslim who becomes desperate will become an unbeliever. Still, desperation is an attribute of disbelief. You should not grow desperate under any circumstances. If your intentions are sincere and if your goal is to please God, why should you be desperate? Even if you are at the bottom like Prophet Joseph, do not lose hope. Look at the story of Joseph. His story is depicted in great detail, but he never voiced any complaint before or after being thrown into the well. So we can conclude that these troubles did not affect him. He kept on his way. When he was jailed, he remained unaffected. He continued to have full faith in his Lord and did not deviate. And eventually he became a popular vizier.”
He then came back to the beginning: “Even if they do not believe and continue to be suspicious, you will not change your way. You will go on with your plans and projects for revival and the strengthening of universal values. Your attitude and behavior will continue to show that you are unfazed by worldly wants or goals. Without giving rise to paranoia, and by using various means, you will say strongly that you do not have motives other than achieving peace and the salvation of humanity. You will use everything from painting to music, from novels to poetry, from cinema to sports as a means. Some may raise objections. So be it. Some may have doubts if this is the right thing today. Let them. Why should we not use these means for revival and repair when they have been used for destruction up until now? I am a child of my time. I don’t think anyone who is sane and who can make sense of the world properly will object to them. Even if they do, it means nothing. And you will be patient. You cannot treat chronic and gangrenous wounds all at once and magically.”
Who am I referring to? As you may have guessed, to Fethullah Gülen, also known as hocaefendi.
* Dr. Ahmet Kurucan is a theologian.

Gülen movement will be liquidated; KCK suspects will be released

By Emre Uslu

Kck'ya Sunulan Rapor: Demokratik Adımlar Örgütün İşini Zorlaştırıyor, Mehmet Akın


The title summarizes the gist of the whole discussion of the most recent crisis. This is the plan commonly held by MİT, BDP/KCK (Peace and Democracy Party and Kurdish Communities Union) circles and some pro-negotiation intellectuals.
Public opinion was ready for the implementation of this plan when the prosecutor summoned the MİT undersecretary.
Recall that one of the texts included in the agreement between MİT and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) read, “The parties shall work to establish a constitutional council, peace council and truth and justice commission over the same period; and to this end, they are forwarding the names they prefer for inclusion in these commissions and councils.” We have seen that the articles in the agreement are being executed. Some of the intellectuals who sided with MİT in the recent crisis were named for inclusion in the peace council and truth and justice commission spelled out in the agreement. Some of them also joined team efforts that could be viewed as forerunners of the peace council and truth and justice commission. The recent columns and writings by one of those names are important in that they demonstrated the details of the operation in the process.
This writer, who has been referring to the presumption of innocence since the Feb. 28 era and stressing that others cannot be held responsible for an offense by an individual, is now requesting the removal of the pro-Gülen movement figures within the bureaucracy in his writings and the TV programs on which he appeared.
There are two problems with this call. First, how would you decide who is pro-Gülen and who is not within the bureaucratic establishment, and which legal criteria would you use? Are you going to flag people like they did in the Feb. 28 process? Are you defending the flagging?

read more!