By Emre Uslu
| The title summarizes the gist of the whole discussion of the most recent crisis. This is the plan commonly held by MİT, BDP/KCK (Peace and Democracy Party and Kurdish Communities Union) circles and some pro-negotiation intellectuals. | |
| Public opinion was ready for the implementation of this plan when the prosecutor summoned the MİT undersecretary. Recall that one of the texts included in the agreement between MİT and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) read, “The parties shall work to establish a constitutional council, peace council and truth and justice commission over the same period; and to this end, they are forwarding the names they prefer for inclusion in these commissions and councils.” We have seen that the articles in the agreement are being executed. Some of the intellectuals who sided with MİT in the recent crisis were named for inclusion in the peace council and truth and justice commission spelled out in the agreement. Some of them also joined team efforts that could be viewed as forerunners of the peace council and truth and justice commission. The recent columns and writings by one of those names are important in that they demonstrated the details of the operation in the process. This writer, who has been referring to the presumption of innocence since the Feb. 28 era and stressing that others cannot be held responsible for an offense by an individual, is now requesting the removal of the pro-Gülen movement figures within the bureaucracy in his writings and the TV programs on which he appeared. There are two problems with this call. First, how would you decide who is pro-Gülen and who is not within the bureaucratic establishment, and which legal criteria would you use? Are you going to flag people like they did in the Feb. 28 process? Are you defending the flagging? read more! |
No comments:
Post a Comment